LandWISE Project Manager Alex Dickson discusses some of her thoughts on Regenerative Agriculture after her trip to Europe in June.
As I grapple with my own understanding of Regenerative Agriculture (RA), a trip to Europe was just the thing I needed to provide me with more questions than answers!
- What are the right policy tools to support both sustainable food production and growers making a livelihood?
- How does RA scale to go beyond a ‘buzz word’ to have a meaningful impact on the environment?
- What role do large corporations play in the transition to Regen Ag?
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.landwise.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Bayer-Germany.jpeg?resize=640%2C319&ssl=1)
EU Green Deal- Farm to Fork Policy
In 2020 the European Union introduced the Farm to Fork (FTF) policy as part of the EU Green Deal. The policy aims to rethink the whole food value chain, minimise the environmental impact of food production, improve resource efficiency and enhance biodiversity.
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.landwise.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image.png?resize=306%2C273&ssl=1)
Targets set by the FTF include:
- 50% reduction in the use and risk of chemical pesticides by 2030
- 50% reduction in nutrient losses, while ensuring no deterioration in soil fertility by 2030
- 20% reduction in fertiliser use by 2030
- 50% reduction in the sales of antimicrobials for farmed animals and aquaculture by 2030
- 25% of total farmland to be farmed organically by 2030 (9.9% of farmed area was under organic farming in 2021).
These are ambitious targets. In response to these targets, European businesses of all sizes are having to rethink what ‘the system’ looks like in the future and how they fit into food production not only in the face of environmental policy like the FTF, but also in a changing natural environment.
“Regenerative practices are for the future, not for today”
A quote by Tony Salas (founder of Shared X, Peru) at the 2024 IFAMA Conference in a session dedicated to discussing the future Regenerative Agriculture. Shifting from conventional growing methods to regenerative methods shifts the focus from yield, to the management of a functional ecosystem with an emphasis on healthy soils.
Salas reflected on the challenges that the Organic Agricultural movement has had in scaling globally, in 2021 only about 1.6% of total agricultural land was managed organically, and in global food sales organic produce accounted for 1-2%. Such challenges include regulatory barriers, reduced yields, market and distribution challenges and lower profitability.
So what should the regenerative system approach be? How do we scale RA to improve ecosystem and soil health, AND ALSO feed a growing global population, meet increasingly stringent regulatory targets and provide farmers and growers with a good income? Three key points stood out;
- Focus on adopting a continuous improvement model (Plan>Do>Check>Act) at all stages of the food-value chain
- Develop flexible standards and avoid exclusive certification
- Actions must be underpinned with a focus of minimising agricultures contribution to climate change.
“From ‘producing more with less’ to ‘producing more and restoring more’.”
A comment from Kai Wirtz from Bayer, one of the worlds largest agri-chemical companies. Bayer are putting Regenerative Agriculture (RA) at the heart of their company, with a vision to restore nature, and scale regenerative agriculture. They believe that it is possible to grow more using regenerative practices. Their sustainability commitments include reducing GHG emissions per kilogram of crop by 30%, reducing the environmental impact of crop protection by 30%, and supporting 100 million smallholder farms in low and middle-income countries.
Bayer has a global footprint, and they see their portfolio of products and technologies being integrated into regenerative agricultural systems, taking a multi-crop/multi-season approach to farming. This portfolio includes biologicals, crop protection, advanced seed breeding and digital tools.
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.landwise.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/IMG_6648.jpeg?resize=640%2C853&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.landwise.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/IMG_6674.jpeg?resize=640%2C480&ssl=1)
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.landwise.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/IMG_6682.jpeg?resize=640%2C853&ssl=1)
“Regenerative agriculture is not a destination but a path”
I have arrived home with more questions than answers.
Europe appears to be leaning into regenerative agriculture in a big way, in response to not only stricter environmental policy, but also in what seems to be reasonably genuine concern for the future of the planet and our collective ability to feed a growing population. Large companies (like Bayer) are positioning themselves in the market to support growers in implementing regenerative practices to suit their individual farm systems in countries around the world. We see this in platforms like the Sustainable Agricultural Initiative (SAI), who have signed on over 180 global companies, with the shared goal of transforming agricultural practice for a more sustainable future.
Back in New Zealand, I wonder if we are taking regenerative agriculture serious enough? There are many unknowns, we don’t really know how RA works in NZ farm systems (though we are trying to find out) and change is scary – I find that in our own project. However, I think we know enough to have a go, to start exploring ways of improving management practice to restore ecosystem and soil health.
How do we scale regenerative agriculture in a way that we have meaningful impact on restoring the environment? How do we access the technologies being developed overseas to support change? What does the future of market access look like if we don’t adapt? What does the future of our environment look like if we don’t start to look after our soils?
Or to put it more positively, what does the future look like if we do start to look after our soils? What are the possibilities?